<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jim Lipsey &#187; Product Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lipsey.org/jim/category/product-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lipsey.org/jim</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:47:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Product Design Aimed at Limiting User Capability</title>
		<link>http://www.lipsey.org/jim/2006/09/28/product-design-aimed-at-limiting-user-capability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lipsey.org/jim/2006/09/28/product-design-aimed-at-limiting-user-capability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lipsey.org/jim/2006/09/28/product-design-aimed-at-limiting-user-capability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In product development, a great deal of effort is made in specifying a product&#8217;s affordances &#8211; the capabilities and actions that it will provide to the user. A product developer in the UK recently launched Architectures of Control, a blog &#8230; <a href="http://www.lipsey.org/jim/2006/09/28/product-design-aimed-at-limiting-user-capability/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image54" style="float: left;" src="http://www.lipsey.org/jim/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/canon_g3d.jpg" alt="The Canon G3" />In product development, a great deal of effort is made in specifying a product&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordance">affordances</a> &#8211; the capabilities and actions that it will provide to the user.  A product developer in the UK recently launched <a href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk">Architectures of Control</a>, a blog that documents the increasing practice of infecting products with ways to restrict, rather than expand, users&#8217; capabilities. He has plenty of material to work with, from examples of planned obsolescence, to crippled software that forces customers toward more expensive options, to anti-skateboarding ribs that can be bolted all over public spaces.<br />
<span id="more-53"></span><br />
Recently Canon launched the G7 digital camera. The G series has been a flagship brand for Canon, aimed toward prosumers who aren&#8217;t looking to plop down $2000 for glass in order to justify a dSLR. When we bought a G3 four years ago, it was considered a ground-breaking model.  What does the G7 add to our model that is three generations old (they skipped the G4)? It has a higher resolution sensor that produces marginally better pictures because the smaller pixel size ads noise to the images. What else do we get by &#8216;upgrading&#8217;? The loss of a flip-out, rotatable screen, a slower lens, the removal of RAW support, shorter battery life, and the elimation of a remote control for family photos. All this for only $700. But it comes in a really nice black metal housing.</p>
<p>In other words, too many people were choosing the G series over Canon&#8217;s dSLRs and the model needed to be crippled. Canon is removing affordances to drive a more expensive product.</p>
<p>Dan Lockton <a href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=117">is seeking a better name</a> for <em>Architectures of Control</em>. My submission is to go with <em>Disaffordances</em>. The major domain names are even available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lipsey.org/jim/2006/09/28/product-design-aimed-at-limiting-user-capability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

